Lake Martin Topics: Pollution

Lake Martin Topics

(Lake Martin Specific)

111,183 messages

Updated 6/9/2024 1:00:09 PM

Off-Topic

Lakes Online Forum

83,663 messages

Updated 6/10/2024 6:28:47 PM

Boat Maintenance

Lakes Online Forum

5,197 messages

Updated 6/10/2024 5:39:11 AM

Lake Martin Fishing

(Lake Martin Specific)

4,171 messages

Updated 5/29/2024 10:51:34 PM

Jokes

Lakes Online Forum

4,170 messages

Updated 6/10/2024 6:29:37 PM

Sports

Lakes Online Forum

4,261 messages

Updated 5/28/2024 6:31:10 AM

Grilling & Recipes

Lakes Online Forum

2,977 messages

Updated 6/10/2024 6:30:23 PM

Lake Martin SCUBA

(Lake Martin Specific)

169 messages

Updated 5/31/2023 1:39:35 PM

Tallapoosa River Topics

Lakes Online Forum

98 messages

Updated 4/15/2024 1:00:58 AM

Forum Usage Rules

Welcome, Guest

Select View Mode: [ classic | beta | recent ]

	Name:	Pier Pressure -
	Subject:	Pollution
	Date:	5/22/2007 4:58:03 PM

Treated waste water to me is not what is being questioned. I have heard some state that they are seeing a film on the water, and that there is a visible sludge on the shore. My observation is two fold, do they understand the difference between films produced by pollen (which is the worse I have ever seen) verses the claim that they have observed raw sewage?

If in fact there is raw sewage being released into the lake then everyone should have a problem with that, as treated wastewater is NOT raw sewage. Why doesn't someone look into some independent testing methodologies instead of just using harsh verbiage?

This is worse than everyone’s "opinions" about big boats. Neither discussion was scientific, both are politically motivated!!!

Let’s see some technical testing facts instead of this lawsuit that someone didn't notify within timeframes.... etc. How about the exact findings of minerals and bio-contaminants in the area questioned?