Name:   MartiniMan - Subject:   Is This Study Valid?????? Date:   7/20/2020 9:53:05 AM (updated 7/20/2020 10:38:11 AM)

This study reminds me too much of the Lancet article that had to be withdrawn.  Lots of suspect aspects to the study and the fact that it was released to the media before it was peer reviewed and very preliminary sounded far too political to me.  And I likewise thought it was very strange the lack of testing of their subjects for the virus.  Didn't notice the high rate of adverse effects but that too is very strange given that HCQ is prescribed 5 million times a year and has been around for over 40 years.  Their results are also totally at odds with other well-designed studies like the one in Michigan. 

But the title is like catnip to TDS sufferers.  I literally cannot understand the pathology of people that oppose a cheap, readily available and widely used drug that seems to work on many people.  It's almost like they wish it weren't effective for some reason.