Name:	lucky67 -	Reply
Subject:	Amendment 2
Date:	10/28/2016 8:16:09 PM

whats the botttom line ?

Name:	alatraveler50 -	Reply
Subject:	Amendment 2
Date:	10/29/2016 10:06:44 AM

As I see it, a yes vote will allow the park system to keep the monies that it generates.  As it is now the money the parks generate are being given to the state's general fund and therefore used for what ever the legislature wants.  Some trickles back to the parks and the rest goes to prisons, agriculture, roads, salaries, etc.  There is a provision to allow for the parks to employ commercial businesses to do business inside the parks (concessions) when and where fesible, not to operate the park itself.

By voting yes, the park system will allow the parks to grow and enhance their properties which should bring in more visitors to the parks and thereby bring in more monies to the surrounding communities.  That means more tax dollars for local governments.

Name:	HARRY -	Reply
Subject:	Please read thoroughly.
Date:	10/30/2016 6:48:54 PM

i think there is a bit more to it than that.

Name:	George -	Reply
Subject:	Please read thoroughly.
Date:	10/31/2016 2:07:59 PM

Well Harry, you're not limited to 140 characters on this forum.

Name:	Samdog -	Reply
Subject:	Please read thoroughly.
Date:	11/2/2016 2:00:07 PM

Are you refering to the 50million dollar limit or the private companies developing in state parks?

Name:	HARRY -	Reply
Subject:	Please read thoroughly.
Date:	11/2/2016 10:13:04 PM

The private company part.